some backhaul bandwidth calculation
2G - per antenna/basestation 5Mbps
5Mhz - GSM carrier -200kHz = 25 carriers
7 channels per carrier -> so 175 channels
HSPA+ 22/42 Mbps ( up/down) (using 5Mhz)
LTE 86/326 Mbps ( if 20Mhz)
how much bandwidth improvement via LTE 20Mhz( who has 20Mhz?)
LTE design for telecom - key objective is latency
LTE still is highly telecom optimized( why using expensive telecom oriented
network technology to serve internet traffic?
- Do we really need 10ms or even 1ms latency?
bad baby discipline ( 壞寶寶)- spend huge efforts to serve poor quality users
Wide LTE deployment is because of WiMAX competition
WiMaz ( since 2000- called Worldwide interoperability of "microwave" access)
- it was backhaul microwave technology
802.16d fixed WiMAX
then mobile WiMax 802.16e ( by Sprint)
Why Intel promoted WiMax/WiFi -> push more computing requirements
-- same as virtualzation or NFV ......
Qulacomm was the killer to WiMax
Death of WiMax
- Sprint+interl mobile WiMax
- China denied Wimax (
- Loss of India support ( Qualcomm)
2G - per antenna/basestation 5Mbps
5Mhz - GSM carrier -200kHz = 25 carriers
7 channels per carrier -> so 175 channels
HSPA+ 22/42 Mbps ( up/down) (using 5Mhz)
LTE 86/326 Mbps ( if 20Mhz)
how much bandwidth improvement via LTE 20Mhz( who has 20Mhz?)
LTE design for telecom - key objective is latency
LTE still is highly telecom optimized( why using expensive telecom oriented
network technology to serve internet traffic?
- Do we really need 10ms or even 1ms latency?
bad baby discipline ( 壞寶寶)- spend huge efforts to serve poor quality users
Wide LTE deployment is because of WiMAX competition
WiMaz ( since 2000- called Worldwide interoperability of "microwave" access)
- it was backhaul microwave technology
802.16d fixed WiMAX
then mobile WiMax 802.16e ( by Sprint)
Why Intel promoted WiMax/WiFi -> push more computing requirements
-- same as virtualzation or NFV ......
Qulacomm was the killer to WiMax
Death of WiMax
- Sprint+interl mobile WiMax
- China denied Wimax (
- Loss of India support ( Qualcomm)
Comments